Myth-Busting: Vector Stores in AI
Having talked to multiple folks who are βbuilding AIβ, Iβve seen firsthand how easy it is to get swept up in the latest buzzwords. One such buzzword is ππ¦π€π΅π°π³ ππ΅π°π³π¦π΄. Letβs dissect some prevailing beliefs about vector stores:
1. Vector stores as the default
- π΄πππ: Vector stores are the default for all AI retrieval.
- πΉππππππ: While vector stores are powerful, they arenβt always the best fit. For instance, if youβre dealing with a database of Customer Events, a traditional query can efficiently fetch the data, which can then be processed by a language model for further insights.
2. The new era of application development
- π΄πππ: Vector stores signal a new era in application development.
- πΉππππππ: The underlying tech, like LLMs and embeddings, is based on transformer technology. Itβs an expansion, not a replacement. Think of it as adding a new tool to your workshop, not rebuilding the entire workshop.
3. The βAI-firstβ badge of honor
- π΄πππ: Using vector stores = βAI-firstβ badge of honor.
- πΉππππππ: Being βAI-firstβ is about strategy and innovation. For example, a company might use AI to enhance user experience, but that doesnβt mean every tool in their stack is AI-driven.
4. Universality of vector search
- π΄πππ: Vector search is universally superior.
- πΉππππππ: It depends on the data. For unstructured data, vector search shines. But if youβre searching a product catalog with specific attributes, traditional keyword search might be faster and more accurate.
Iβd love to hear from you. Have you encountered other myths in the AI space? Happy to take it over DMs too.